On Sun 07 Dec 2014 at 20:29:37 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > On 12/07/2014 at 06:37 PM, Mart van de Wege wrote: > > > It is a small mistake, not worth bothering about, > > That depends on its consequences, which in some circumstances can be > significant enough to be worth caring about.
Indeed. And caring enough about it implies doing something positive about it. > > unless of course you persist in disclaiming your own responsibility > > and blaming your tools. > > Huh?? > > This seems almost backwards. > > If you can abort the in-progress fsck, then by doing so you assume > responsibility for the consequences of doing it. > > If you can't abort the in-progress fsck, then where does "your > responsibility" come into it? By not using the tools already in your possession to do something about it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/08122014113501.6764f17c9...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk
