To any listmasters that might be paying attention.
Perhaps it's time to establish policy that meta-meta-discussions about
what's on-topic and what's not, are themselves off-topic, and grounds
for moderation? All of the wrangling, degenerating into name calling,
conspiracy theories, and profanity seems to be eating up far, far more
bandwidth than any of the topics that are being discussed (it seems like
a mention of systemd - be it a pro statement, an anti statement, a
complaint about the TC decision, or even a legitimate bug report or
support question, leads to dozens of "that's offtopic" and "no it's not"
exchanges). Lots of noise, not at all productive, maybe it's time for
someone to put their foot down?
Respectfully,
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5471e6b7.6060...@meetinghouse.net
