Le 16/11/2014 19:22, Patrick Bartek a écrit : > On Sun, 16 Nov 2014, Klistvud wrote: > >> Dne, 21. 10. 2014 04:06:23 je Marty napisal(a): >>> On 10/20/2014 03:45 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: >>>> After much vitriolic gnashing of teeth from those opposed to >>>> systemd, I wonder... What is a better alternative? And it can't >>>> be sysvinit. >> Why not? I do not see sysvinit -- or any other legacy init system, >> for that matter -- as contradicting the following: > Systemd is intended as a "modern" replacement for sysvinit. I wanted > to know if not systemd, what init others would choose to replace > sysvinit. Simple question. Difficult to answer. > > B > > Please define "modern". And no, new is not equivalent of better.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5468efc7.4020...@rail.eu.org
