On 11/10/2014 2:50 PM, Martin Read <zen75...@zen.co.uk> wrote: > On 10/11/14 19:26, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Exactly, it should remain in unstable unless/until it can be released >> *perfectly* stable, so if that means it stays in unstable for 5 years, >> so be it. > > If you want *perfectly* stable software, why are you using software that > isn't formally proven?
'Perfect' was obviously a bad choice of word... but systemd is hardly close to 'stable', in so much as 'Debian stable' is concerned... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54611b90.7090...@libertytrek.org