On Nov 8, 2014 12:24 PM, "Miles Fidelman" <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> wrote: > > Mart van de Wege wrote: >> >> Slavko <li...@slavino.sk> writes: >> >>> Ahoj, >>> >>> Dňa Sat, 08 Nov 2014 16:03:46 +0100 Mart van de Wege >>> <mvdw...@gmail.com> napísal: >>> >>>> Why don't the anti-systemd people do what they've been threatening the >>>> whole time and fuck off to another distro or to FreeBSD? >>> >>> This is exact example why i stopped all my contribution to Debian, and >>> i will not start it again, despite if i stay with Debian in future or >>> not! I orphan my packages in near future. >>> >>> If the community consider people which have another opinion as bad, it >>> is time do not contribute to it more. And whole debate is about one >>> idea: If you don't like systemd, you are stupid. >>> >> I consider people that bring nothing else but their opinion to the table >> as lesser than people who do the actual development, yes. In this >> discussion at least. >> >> If you can't even be bothered to set up a test server to look at >> systemd, but instead foul up the mailing lists creating a climate where >> threats to the actual developers become normal, then you can sod off. I >> wouldn't trust you to sit the right way on a toilet seat. >> > > So you're saying that reading specs, documentation, install reports, bug reports, q&a threads about specific problems, and so forth, are not useful ways to evaluate technology? Where I come from, that's called doing one's homework. >
If that's suggesting those supplant actual testing..... If you're suggesting docs should be considered *as well*, absolutely.
