Le 06.11.2014 10:26, Andrei POPESCU a écrit :
On Mi, 05 nov 14, 09:32:57, Miles Fidelman wrote:
3. What other options/initiatives are you aware of that you've
discarded or otherwise are not considering, and why?
Not sure why you're not considering Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. Due to the
BSD
kernel it's guaranteed to not have systemd, not even the libraries,
and
it's still Debian.
The last news I had about it, were that it would not be an official
release for next stable, Jessie. I was really sad when I learned about
that, because it was in my plans to try to use it. I did some tests,
too, which were not good enough to allow me to use it on a desktop for
work, so I was looking at Jessie to give it more tries, giving that it
would gave me my usual Debian feeling plus some discoveries about how
freeBSD supports hardware. Maybe then, I would have switched to BSD, but
I would have been prepared. I still might go in that direction, but it
will be without assurance that I'll understand what I'll need to do.
Here's the text:
The final architecture check was completed in mid-September, and the
current agreed list of architectures for Jessie is amd64, armel and
armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc
and s390x. The final decision for kFreeBSD ports, for which human
resources is a concern, and arm64 and ppc64el ports, which made good
progress and have strong support, is expected in the very beginning of
November.
So, we still do not know if kFree will be supported or not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/9217f1ec9eefa2d4b4cf446647cab...@neutralite.org
