On 2014-10-20, John Garret <johngarret2...@mail.com> wrote: > Debian backports security patches (etc) to its stable distribution, which can > be used for years and years. > RHEL does too, but this costs subscription money. > If debian becomes unstable (via systemd etc) and ever more subject to churn, > that's some competition out of the way. > > Future: if you want stability RHEL is the only option, because debian has been > subverted and is being torpedoed. > > If you want something without churn you'll only have redhat to turn to. > That's one reason why this is being done. > (Most establishments like stability, why go with RHEL when Debian is free)
RHEL has adopted systemd. The author of systemd is a Red Hat employee. -- Liam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnm4ck5k.3a0.liam.p.otoole@dipsy.tubbynet
