On 2014-10-20, Alan Greenberger <ala...@ptd.net> wrote:
> Thank you for responding.
>
> On 2014-10-20, Darac Marjal <mailingl...@darac.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> Content-Disposition: inline
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:21:58PM -0400, Alan Greenberger wrote:
>>> This morning I tried to update a wheezy recently upgraded from squeeze.
>>> It didn't work and I am stuck.
>>>=20
>>> # aptitude update
>>> # aptitude
>>> g
>>> u
>>
>> You update aptitude twice?
> This was a typo, a meant U not u.
>>
>>> These packages could be upgraded, but they have been kept in their
>>> current state to avoid breaking dependencies.
>>
>> Which packages?
> Lots that have changed in the last few weeks.
>>
>>> q
>>> b (just beeps)
>>
>> 'b' searches for packages which are broken, but you've just been told
>> that packages were held specifically to stop that happening.
>>
>>>=20
>>> There were some error messages about lilo
>>
>> What were the error messages?
> Something went by, can't recall.
>>
>>> # dpkg -l lilo
>>> iF lilo 1:23.2-4 amd64
>>> # aptitude
>>> /lilo
>>> C lilo 1:23.2-4 1:23.2=
>> -4=20
>>>=20
>>> # dpkg-reconfigure lilo
>>> /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: lilo is broken or not fully installed
>>
>> OK. But why is lilo broken?
>>
>>>=20
>>> # aptitude install debsums
>>> debsums libfile-fnmatch-perl{a}=20
>>> The following partially installed packages will be configured:
>>> lilo
>>> ...
>>> Errors were encountered while processing:
>>> lilo
>>>=20
>>> # debsums lilo
>>> debsums: package lilo is not installed
>>
>> debsums didn't install because lilo failed to configure.=20
> desums DID install. Line above shows it running complaining "lilo is
> not installed"
>>
>>>=20
>>> # aptitude reinstall lilo
>>> The following packages will be REINSTALLED:
>>> lilo=20
>>> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 50
>>> not upgraded.
>>> Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
>>> E: Internal Error, No file name for lilo:amd64
>>
>> OK. Finally, we get to an actual error message. Apt is trying to find a
>> package for lilo:amd64, but can't for some reason.
>>
>> Please let us know the output of:
>>
>> $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list{,.d/*.list}
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian wheezy-backports main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org wheezy main non-free
>> $ apt-cache policy lilo
> lilo:
> Installed: 1:23.2-4
> Candidate: 1:23.2-4
> Version table:
> *** 1:23.2-4 0
> 500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main amd64 Packages
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>> $ dpkg --audit
> The following packages are only half configured, probably due to problems
> configuring them the first time. The configuration should be retried using
> dpkg --configure <package> or the configure menu option in dselect:
> lilo LInux LOader - the classic OS boot loader
>
> The following packages are missing the md5sums control file in the
> database, they need to be reinstalled:
> ...
>>
>
> OK, I tried the whole thing again this morning and lo and behold, this
> time aptitude was able to do the update and complete! Though for
> unknown reason, it decided to uninstall acroread. (Maybe this all has
> to do with 32 bit programs? I have dpkg --print-foreign-architectures
> is i386.)
>
> But the reported problem with lilo remains. Can't reconfigure, can't
> reinstall. I am hesitant to uninstall lilo.
I seem to have solved the lilo problem. I tried
# dpkg --configure lilo
It complained about not being able to write already existing
/boot/sarge.bmp and /boot/sid.bmp . So I deleted those two symbolic
links, ran it again, and it completed. Now dpkg -l lilo gives
ii lilo 1:23.2-4 amd64
and aptitude shows it as
i --\ lilo 1:23.2-4 1:23.2-4
Hopefully this machine is back in business. I don't know what caused
all of this, but something must have gotten out of whack during the
recent upgrade to wheezy that only showed up when I tried to update
yesterday morning. I don't know what I typed yesterday that managed to
get interactive aptitude out of its angry state.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnm4amo6.c9o.alanjg@archduke.router
