Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:59:24AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
lee:
I'm sure we could find quite a few supporters for having a GR amongst
the users (here).
We don't do a GR among our users. We do that among Debian
members/maintainers/developers/take-your-pick.
Which does kind of lead back to the question of what's the point of a social
contract that says users and their needs are the priority.
Don't confuse "wants" with "needs".
This has been raised before. You should post on debian-project, and get
the answer from the 'horses' mouth.
Somehow - stable system, minimal impact of an upgrade, backward
compatibility are more than "wants."
Of those, most …
* are perfectly happy with the TC's decision
* can live with it
* are unhappy, but think that to continue discussing this is way worse
than biting the bullet and getting on with actual work
* you do know that we plan to release Jessie sometime this decade,
right?
* are disillusioned about it all and decided to stand aside
Judging by the last couple of months, the rest appears to number <6 people.
A lot more than that, by my count.
Are you referring to DD's? I believe Matthias was.
Well... "more than that, by my count" seems to apply to debian-devel as
well. I kind of think it's a matter of:
" * are disillusioned about it all and decided to stand aside"
And, as a couple of folks have now pointed out, a lot of developers did
not know about the initial vote proposal.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/543be361.9080...@meetinghouse.net
