On 10/13/2014 5:43 AM, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 07:32:40 +0100
> Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:05:14PM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> Among other things, legitimate MTAs have MX records.
>>
>> Not necessarily. In the absence of an MX record an A record is
>> perfectly legitimate.
>>
>>
> 
> And as I've pointed out to Jerry, a lot of businesses outsource their
> incoming email to commercial spam-cleaning services, as well as larger
> businesses using separate send and receive servers, and some businesses
> receiving email direct but sending via a smarthost. In each of these
> cases, the MX would not necessarily have any connection with the
> mail sending address. My IP address A-PTR record pair have no direct
> connection with any of the email domains I use, with any MX, or any HELO
> strings I send.
> 
> There's no one size fitting all with email. Heck, some people use
> Yahoo...
> 

Yes, they outsource their anti-spam.  But they do NOT outsource the
servers themselves.  In many cases, they cannot do so for legal reasons;
for instance, in the U.S., many publicly traded companies must keep all
emails (even spam) for a specific length of time.  The same is true of
companies with certain Federal Government contracts.

And can you identify any legitimate business which has separate email
servers?  Just because you do it wrong does not mean the rest of the
world does.  I can think of a number of companies which will silently
drop emails from a configuration such as yours (or at least relegate
them to the company's spam folder and not deliver them).

Jerry


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/543bc359.4010...@attglobal.net

Reply via email to