On Sb, 11 oct 14, 12:19:29, Marty wrote: > > >Could it be that a modular design for such complex tasks becomes too > >difficult to *do it right*? > > I don't know, but I think given its history, the burden of proof is on > monolithic, not modular design. A better question may be whether a > distributed volunteer project can do real system architecture? (Where is > CERN when you need them?)
Who's history, Linux' (the kernel)? :p Couldn't it be that the fact that so many are embracing the "monolithic" design of systemd is a sign that the modular design was... suboptimal and nobody came up with a better one? Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
