On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 09:50, Jeffrey Barish wrote: > Marshal Wong wrote: > > On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 20:21, Jeffrey Barish wrote: > > > >>When I use the kernel that I built from the source for 2.4.18-686, I get > >>the message: > >> > >>sendto: Network is unreachable > >> > >>when I try to ping another machine on my network. Using ifconfig, I > >>noticed that eth0 had no IP address assigned. So I did > >> > >>ifconfig eth0 down > >> > >>and then > >> > >>ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.8 netmask 255.255.255.0 up > >> > >>At that point, ping worked. So it seems as if dhcp is not working. Is > >>there something in the kernel configuration that is required to make > >>dhcp work? > >> > >>I am still not able to browse the web. I get the message "Could not > >>connect to host ..." no matter what URL I use. > >> > > > > > > I've noticed that dhcp doesn't change any configurations. If I run > > dhclient, it spews out the information for the dhcp, but that's it. It > > doesn't change any network settings. It's been that way for a long time > > now, but I've just worked around it... Good to know that someone else > > is having the problem... > > > > Anyways, to help you with the "Could no connect to host..." problem, you > > probably need to add a default gateway to your routing table. > > > > Check if the default gateway is reasonable using > > > > # route (as root. Haha!) > > > > If not, then > > > > # route add default gw <ip.address.of.gateway> > > > > Good Luck. > > > > Marshal > > Your suggestion solved the problem. I also had > auto eth0 > iface eth0 inet dhcp > in my /etc/network/interfaces, but the routing was not correct until I > issued the route command manually. > > I still don't understand why there is a difference depending on whether > I boot the kernel that I built from 2.4.18-686 source or use the > standard kernel in that distribution. The standard kernel gets > everything right without my issuing the ifconfig and route commands. > Also, I see dhclient running with the standard kernel. I'm thinking > that the problem when I run my kernel that requires the ifconfig and > route commands arises because dhcp doesn't run, and dhcp doesn't run > because something is not configured correctly in my kernel. What do I > need to turn on when I configure my kernel to get dhcp? Is there some > other explanation for why dhcp doesn't run with my kernel? >
You know, that could be where the problem is, because I didn't have that problem until I started playing around with my kernel... Unfortunately, I'm in the same position as you. I have no idea why it would make a difference. Marshal
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
