On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:48:13 +0200 lee <[email protected]> wrote: > So i3 doesn't have any advantages for me --- fvwm is much more > flexible and without the utter confusion that arises when you try to > arrange a number of windows in a particular manner with i3. It even > wastes less screen space than i3 because I don't need a status bar > and no containers.
Hi Lee, Because you use fvwm on a regular basis, you should write some documentation on it. I know it's excellent because I've seen people operate it in a fast and efficient manner, but because I don't know what I'm doing and I have little fvwm documentation, every time I try to use fvwm things go wrong fast. I'm pretty sure that fvwm is native on OpenBSD, and some "small" Linux distros. Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
