On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 04:05:53PM CEST, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> said: > On Tuesday 02 September 2014 14:52:46 Joe wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 23:44:49 +1200 > > > > Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 07:22:48AM +0000, KD wrote: > > > > Dan Ritter <dsr <at> randomstring.org> writes: > > > > > Reading: > > > > > http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems > > > > >.html > > > > > > > > > > systemd's upstream is explicitly interested in taking over all > > > > > Linux distros, not in the minor sense of being supported on > > > > > every system but in the major sense of making package management > > > > > conform to their own views. > > > > > > > > There's one sentence in the cited article I really like: > > > > "I originally intended to discuss this at the Linux Plumbers > > > > Conference (which I assumed was the right forum for this kind of > > > > major plumbing level improvement), and at linux.conf.au, but there > > > > was no interest in my session submissions there..." > > > > > > At least he had the good sense to not even consider discussing it on > > > the debian-user mailing list. > > > > So is this vision of the future not likely to affect Debian, then? I > > get the impression it is expected to do so. > > This endless verbosity will not make one iota of difference. Lobby those who > might be able to do something if you feel like it, e.g. the developers. But > it really doesn't count as support for users of Debian.
Is it so difficuklt to think that users and admin may have a word to say about the direction they prefer for the evolution of debian ? Are they not free to express what they feel abiout announcements like this article ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140902144712.gj24...@rail.eu.org
