unsubscribe


> On Aug 13, 2014, at 10:21 PM, debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org 
> wrote:
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> debian-user-digest Digest                Volume 2014 : Issue 1074
> 
> Today's Topics:
>  Re: par2                              [ Joel Rees <joel.r...@gmail.com> ]
>  Re: calendar world cup (portuguese)   [ Beco <r...@beco.cc> ]
>  Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Iro  [ Joel Rees <joel.r...@gmail.com> ]
>  default layout for web server (jessi  [ Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> ]
>  kernel upgrade in squeeze; was Re: T  [ pe...@easthope.ca ]
>  Re: default layout for web server (j  [ John Bleichert <syb...@earthlink.ne ]
>  Re: Egad stumped by fetchmail ...     [ Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> ]
>  Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Iro  [ Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> ]
>  Re: networking fails with temporary   [ Rusi Mody <rustompm...@gmail.com> ]
>  Problem with Debian 6 LTS and vlc     [ Bret Busby <bret.bu...@gmail.com> ]
>  Re: How to mount a LUKS partition fr  [ Joerg Desch <n...@jdesch.de> ]
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:44:16 +0900
> From: Joel Rees <joel.r...@gmail.com>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Subject: Re: par2
> Message-ID: 
> <caar43imvnbobfy9mlkj2enm8skefz+jsuojqxq9ttbqnt63...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 5:20 AM, AW <debian.list.trac...@1024bits.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 16:08:41 -0400
>> Gary Dale <garyd...@torfree.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Whatever for? There are better checksums and md5 doesn't provide error
>>> correction? Even the MD5 man page advises using sha checksums instead.
>> 
>> md5sum provides a relatively quick check... if it fails, then use the "real"
>> check, i.e. pars.  This saves [or seems to save] computing resources...
>> 
>> However, it was just a suggestion...
> 
> Interesting suggestion. Write the error-correction files, but only
> test them if the md5 checksum fails.
> 
> Admittedly, this is not a situation where we are worried about
> attackers, but I'd feel more comfortable, myself, with actually
> checking the full error correction data. Both have holes, but the
> error correction codes provide deeper checks. (Take more space, too,
> but since you want to recover when you can, without referring to
> backups, the space consumption is part of the price you expect to
> pay.)
> 
> If I were being paranoid about errors, I think I'd use full backup
> with grandfathering and periodic complete snapshots on permanent file,
> and with both error correction and sha256 checks, to catch as much
> corruption as possible before it gets into the backup files.
> 
> -- 
> Joel Rees
> 
> Be careful where you see conspiracy.
> Look first in your own heart.
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:56:09 -0300
> From: Beco <r...@beco.cc>
> To: Darac Marjal <mailingl...@darac.org.uk>
> Cc: Lista Debian User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Subject: Re: calendar world cup (portuguese) and others
> Message-ID: 
> <caluyw2wkq2rkuz1gy8vd7fnzhd7jdi-okkb1p91kxg_eygo...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134cb7c66844605008b89cc
> 
> --001a1134cb7c66844605008b89cc
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Darac:
>>> /usr/share/calendar appears to be owned by the "bsdmainutils" package. I
>>> would suggest filing a wishlist bug against that package with your file
>>> attached.
> Thanks, Darac! I'll do that.
> 
> Cheers,
> Beco
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr Beco
> A.I. researcher
> 
> "I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure
> you realize that what you heard is not what I meant" -- Alan Greenspan
> 
> --001a1134cb7c66844605008b89cc
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> <div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
> te"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-lef=
> t:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"">Darac:
> </div>&gt; /usr/share/calendar appears to be owned by the &quot;bsdmainutil=
> s&quot; package. I<br>&gt; would suggest filing a wishlist bug against that=
> package with your file<br>&gt; attached.<br>
> <br>
> </blockquote></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div>Thanks, Darac! I&#3=
> 9;ll do that.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail=
> _extra">Cheers,</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">Beco</div><div class=3D"gma=
> il_extra">
> 
> <br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr">Dr Beco<br>A.I=
> . researcher<br><div><font color=3D"#444444"><span style=3D"line-height:16p=
> x"><br></span></font></div><div><span style=3D"color:rgb(20,24,35);font-fam=
> ily:Helvetica,Arial,&#39;lucida grande&#39;,tahoma,verdana,arial,sans-serif=
> ;font-size:14px;line-height:19.31999969482422px">&quot;I know you think you=
> understand what you thought I said but I&#39;m not sure you realize that w=
> hat you heard is not what I meant&quot; -- Alan Greenspan</span><font color=
> =3D"#444444"><span style=3D"line-height:16px"><br>
> 
> </span></font><div><span style=3D"color:rgb(68,68,68);font-size:small;line-=
> height:16px"><br></span></div></div></div>
> </div></div>
> 
> --001a1134cb7c66844605008b89cc--
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:48:45 +0900
> From: Joel Rees <joel.r...@gmail.com>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Subject: Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)
> Message-ID: 
> <CAAr43iNXb_osgn5ask3F_StkMHwB6j4=mgrlwjzvky7jf-w...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Chris Bannister
> <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:19:09AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Chris Bannister
>>> <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:09:24PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>>>>> Well, yeah, but ask any marriage counselor what tends to happen when
>>>>> one partner decides arbitrarily what the other needs.
>>>> 
>>>> What does a marriage counselor know about software development? You
>>>> should instead ask the marriage counselor what happens if one partner
>>>> confuses wants with needs.
>>> 
>>> You're the one who decided to use marriage as a metaphor. It cuts both ways.
>> 
>> It was you who started talking about marriage counselors.
> 
> I'd say that you opened the window to the comment, since you talked
> about the difference between perceptions of needs and wants in a
> marriage, and pointed out that, invariably, when there's an argument,
> at least one party in the argument insists that his views of needs is
> correct and the other's claims are just wants. Maybe that's not what
> you intended, but anyone who has tried to help friends or family when
> marriages start falling apart recognize the symptoms.
> 
> Now, I don't know what the attitude towards getting professional help
> is in New Zealand. In America, when an argument about needs vs. wants
> on a single topic drags on for a year or more, friends usually suggest
> professional or semi-professional help. In Japan, admitting to seeking
> help seems to be a source of embarrassment, and suggesting it an
> insult. (But that view is changing a little bit, lately.)
> 
> I refrained from this allegory before, but I'll go ahead and use it:
> 
> When one partner decides that a new technique "needs" to be
> experimented with, and the other is not sanguine to the experience, in
> the US, it can be cause for criminal rape charges.
> 
> If that's too close for comfort, consider this: parents in the US who
> force their ideologies on their children can be charged with criminal
> abuse.
> 
> Really, the whole idea that we have some chattel relationship between
> the devs and the users in debian is entirely inappropriate, just as it
> is in families.
> 
> A four-four draw in the technical committees should have been a call
> to open the discussion to a wider user base, not a call for one member
> of the committee to make an arbitrary decision. Things are not
> functioning correctly "up" there, even if we ignore the Social
> Contract.
> 
> Technical issues cannot be claimed to be inherently superior to social
> issues in any system that is in regular, direct use by humans,
> especially when such technical claims become the basis for unilateral
> action. Such claims are indication of hubris at best, and blind ego in
> this case. (Compare the abusive parent or spouse.)
> 
> Now, in truth, I picked up Fedora only because I was having trouble
> understanding the unwritten rules in play in openbsd. Couldn't read
> the docs and come to the same conclusions as the others on the misc@
> list, so I decided I needed a bit of education, and debian was
> suggested. But we were using RedHat at work, so I picked up Fedora.
> 
> I dropped Fedora and came over to debian because of the systemd
> business. I've seen power abuse in political processes in local
> governments, and I recognized both inappropriate political processes
> and abuses in play as I watched it play out.
> 
> But that was okay, because I needed to pick up debian.
> 
> And now I'm motivated to return to openbsd, which is also all to the
> good. I've got an old laptop up right now, and am running through the
> afterboot man page and finding myself understanding it much better
> than fifteen years ago.
> 
> And the init system was one of the places in openbsd that I could
> follow the examples but couldn't really understand what I was doing.
> But I understand it now. I can see the reasons for things that were
> not at all obvious back then. (And I find myself wondering why on
> earth anyone would want to use anything so redundant and overblown as
> systemd.)
> 
> I could say more, but I think it would not be constructive at this point.
> 
> -- 
> Joel Rees
> 
> Be careful where you see conspiracy.
> Look first in your own heart.
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:54:52 -0400
> From: Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: default layout for web server (jessie)
> Message-ID: <87vbpvriub....@reader.local.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> Last time I fiddled with setting up a web server was some 4-5 yrs ago.
> 
> Things appear to have changed a bit. 
> 
> Can anyone point to a URL or etc that would show what a default layout
> might look like.
> 
> Back when.. /var/www/localhost/htdocs was DocumentRoot and the
> default cgi-bin directory was: /var/www/localhost/cgi-bin.
> 
> Apparently `DocumentRoot' is now:
> /var/www/html/... but where is the default cgi-bin directory?
> 
> I chose web-server during the software choices when installing but 
> /var/www/ contains only ./html and /var/www/html/ contains only the
> default `index.html'.
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:13:24 -0700
> From:  pe...@easthope.ca
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: pe...@easthope.ca
> Subject: kernel upgrade in squeeze; was Re: TP-link TL-WN722N with Squeeze
> Message-Id: <E1XHifU-0000W6-KN@armada.invalid>
> 
> *    From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpope...@gmail.com>
> *    Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:32:32 +0300
>> ... complete output from running apt-get ...
> 
> root@armada:/home/peter# apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686-pae
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree       
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> linux-image-2.6-686-pae : Depends: linux-image-686-pae but it is not going to 
> be installed
> E: Broken packages
> root@armada:/home/peter# 
> 
> 2.6.32 is already running and was reinstalled since the original 
> installation.  
> The preceding makes no sense.
> 
> root@armada:/home/peter# apt-get install linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree       
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae : Depends: linux-base (>= 3~) but 
> 2.6.32-48squeeze6 is to be installed
>                                     Recommends: firmware-linux-free (>= 3~) 
> but 2.6.32-48squeeze6 is to be installed
>                                     Breaks: initramfs-tools (< 0.99~) but 
> 0.98.8 is to be installed
> E: Broken packages
> root@armada:/home/peter# 
> 
>> What does this have to do with the TP-Link in the subject?
> 
> The driver for the Atheros AR9170 chipset in the TP-Link isn't working 
> with the 2.6.32 kernel; upgrade seemed a reasonable approach.  For the 
> subject, my train of thought went off the rails.
> 
> Thanks,                                    ... Peter
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
> Tel +1 360 639 0202  http://carnot.yi.org/  Bcc: peter at easthope. ca
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 22:42:12 -0400
> From: John Bleichert <syb...@earthlink.net>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: default layout for web server (jessie)
> Message-ID: <53ec2204.1030...@earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> On 08/13/2014 08:54 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> <snip>
> 
>> Can anyone point to a URL or etc that would show what a default layout
>> might look like.
>> 
>> Back when.. /var/www/localhost/htdocs was DocumentRoot and the
>> default cgi-bin directory was: /var/www/localhost/cgi-bin.
>> 
>> Apparently `DocumentRoot' is now:
>> /var/www/html/... but where is the default cgi-bin directory?
>> 
>> I chose web-server during the software choices when installing but
>> /var/www/ contains only ./html and /var/www/html/ contains only the
>> default `index.html'.
> 
> Apache on Debian is quite different than non-debian-derived distros. 
> Seems a little odd at first but the Debian layout is useful if you are 
> running multiple virtual servers on one box.
> 
> See:  /usr/share/doc/apache2/README.Debian.gz
> 
> emacs will read it just fine, though you will need to gunzip if with 
> most other text editors. Note that that file location is from stable.
> 
> You can install DocumentRoot anyplace you want. Common sense applies :-)
> 
> John
> 
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------
> John Bleichert    -    syb...@earthlink.net
> The heat from below can burn your eyes out!
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:14:42 +1000
> From: Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Egad stumped by fetchmail ...
> Message-ID: 
> <CAOsGNSSRqU6pDQju99XsaX=W5b6KFM56p3=6fdpqslrvyml...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
>> On 8/14/14, Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> writes:
>> 
>>>> On Mon 11 Aug 2014 at 14:50:30 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The oldhost is running exim4 light, while newhost is running
>>>> exim4-heavy.
>>> 
>>> Exim is only involved after the mail is collected.
>>> 
>>>> But still the configuration files look the same.. I'm not seeing a
>>>> reason why one is more verbose than the other.
>>> 
>>> Messages are being logged to a file but not to the screen?
>> 
>> You have a sharp eye Brian.  I finally noticed the difference in each
>> .fetchmailrc.  host1 old, had the file to log to, commented
>>               host2 new, had the file to log to, uncommented....
>> 
>> So on host2 logging went to the file...
>> Gad what a bozo...
> 
> If you do go to a faster alternative to fetchmail, I strongly suggest
> the "just get one message" option until you have debugged things.
> 
> Good luck,
> Zenaan
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:23:45 +1000
> From: Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Social Contract (was ... Re: Irony)
> Message-ID: 
> <CAOsGNSSGC1fPk=jjxawn9v_zpatj2zv-fhne0m1gozncc4m...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
>> On 8/13/14, Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:10:19PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
>>> Ahoj,
>>> 
>>> D=C5=88a Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:01:05 +1200 Chris Bannister
>>> <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> nap=C3=ADsal:
>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:37:24AM +0200, Slavko wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Our priorities are our users and free software
>>>>> 
>>>>> We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software
>>>>                            ^^^^^
>>>> Needs NOT wants --- there's a HUGE difference.
>>>                                ^^^^^
>>> 
>>> I agree, people need only:
>>> 
>>> - to eat
>>> - to drink
>>> - to respire and
>>> - to sleep
>>> 
>>> - all others are "want".
>> 
>> That was written in the context of what are the users needs with REGARDS
>> to an operating system. I suggest the wording has already been carefully
>> discussed and debated.
> 
> Eaudour Contraire! There is amble room for much more nitpicking and
> linguistic deconstructionism.
> 
> Dear Chris, you are simply not trying hard enough. We do NOT have
> enough percision around these parts!
> 
> And really, you should have put quotes around "what are the users
> needs" since otherwise it is gramatically dubious and lacking in a
> reasonable flow - speaking of context :)
> 
> We're certainly not missing for dead horses - you need to open your
> eyes brother.
> 
> Sorry, that's open your eyes, brother. (I forgot the comma in the
> first instance there, so thought I'd add it in... couldn't bare to be
> so slopy.)
> 
> Best regards,
> Zenaan
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Rusi Mody <rustompm...@gmail.com>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: networking fails with temporary systemd (was auto starting of
>  ppp has stopped working)
> Message-ID: <a0e2132a-a182-471a-a254-a6e0285a9...@googlegroups.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
>> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:20:02 PM UTC+5:30, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> On Lu, 11 aug 14, 07:57:05, Rusi Mody wrote:
>>> If I start from grub using init=/bin/systemd it boots but networking
>>> does not work.
>> 
>> 
>> Please attach the file 'bootlog' after running:
>> 
>>    journalctl -alb > bootlog
> 
> Thanks Andrei
> 
> Tried doing that... does not seem to reach the list.
> 
> So pruning down to what seems relevant and inlining below.
> Notes:
> 1. IPs have been masked. They 'look' ok (are not 192.168 types)
> 2. You asked flasgs -alb. The l does not seem valid. This is with -ab
> 3. Theres some resolvconf issue.  There are bugs I see like
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/1000244
> But I dont know what changes with systemd.
> 4. The second bunch of lines probably comes from the manually given
> modprobe ppp
> pon dsl-provider
> 
> ----------bootlog excerpt--------------
> Aug 14 08:13:14 debian64 networking[418]: Configuring network 
> interfaces...resolvconf: Error: /etc/resolvconf/run/interface either does not 
> exist or is not a directory
> Aug 14 08:13:14 debian64 console-setup[444]: Setting up console font and 
> keymap...done.
> Aug 14 08:13:14 debian64 systemd[1]: Started LSB: Set console font and keymap.
> Aug 14 08:13:14 debian64 networking[418]: resolvconf: Error: 
> /etc/resolvconf/run/interface either does not exist or is not a directory
> Aug 14 08:13:14 debian64 kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not 
> ready
> Aug 14 08:13:14 debian64 kernel: e100 0000:04:08.0 eth0: NIC Link is Up 100 
> Mbps Full Duplex
> Aug 14 08:13:14 debian64 kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link 
> becomes ready
> Aug 14 08:13:14 debian64 networking[418]: resolvconf: Error: 
> /etc/resolvconf/run/interface either does not exist or is not a directory
> Aug 14 08:13:14 debian64 networking[418]: grep: /etc/resolv.conf: No such 
> file or directory
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 ntpdate[596]: Can't find host 0.debian.pool.ntp.org: 
> Name or service not known (-2)
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 ntpdate[596]: Can't find host 1.debian.pool.ntp.org: 
> Name or service not known (-2)
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 ntpdate[596]: Can't find host 2.debian.pool.ntp.org: 
> Name or service not known (-2)
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 ntpdate[596]: Can't find host 3.debian.pool.ntp.org: 
> Name or service not known (-2)
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 ntpdate[596]: no servers can be used, exiting
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 pppd[594]: Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 pppd[594]: Couldn't open the /dev/ppp device: No 
> such file or directory
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 pppd[594]: Linux kernel does not support PPPoE -- 
> are you running 2.4.x?
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 pppd[594]: Exit.
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 networking[418]: Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 networking[418]: Couldn't open the /dev/ppp device: 
> No such file or directory
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 networking[418]: Linux kernel does not support PPPoE 
> -- are you running 2.4.x?
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 networking[418]: Failed to bring up dsl-provider.
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 ntpdate[632]: Can't find host 0.debian.pool.ntp.org: 
> Name or service not known (-2)
> Aug 14 08:13:15 debian64 networking[418]: done.
> 
> Further down the file
> 
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 sudo[957]: siva : TTY=tty1 ; PWD=/home/siva ; 
> USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/modprobe pppoe
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 sudo[957]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened 
> for user root by siva(uid=0)
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 kernel: PPP generic driver version 2.4.2
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 24
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 sudo[957]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed 
> for user root
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 sudo[959]: siva : TTY=tty1 ; PWD=/home/siva ; 
> USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/pon dsl-provider
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 sudo[959]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened 
> for user root by siva(uid=0)
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 pppd[960]: Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 pppd[967]: pppd 2.4.6 started by siva, uid 0
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 sudo[959]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed 
> for user root
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 pppd[967]: PPP session is 10294
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 pppd[967]: Connected to 00:e0:fc:37:3c:02 via 
> interface eth0
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 pppd[967]: Using interface ppp0
> Aug 14 08:13:48 debian64 pppd[967]: Connect: ppp0 <--> eth0
> Aug 14 08:13:50 debian64 sudo[972]: siva : TTY=tty1 ; PWD=/home/siva ; 
> USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/ifconfig
> Aug 14 08:13:50 debian64 sudo[972]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened 
> for user root by siva(uid=0)
> Aug 14 08:13:50 debian64 sudo[972]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed 
> for user root
> Aug 14 08:13:50 debian64 colord[760]: Automatic remove of LBP1210-Gray.. from 
> cups-LBP1210
> Aug 14 08:13:50 debian64 colord[760]: Profile removed: LBP1210-Gray..
> Aug 14 08:13:50 debian64 colord[760]: device removed: cups-LBP1210
> Aug 14 08:13:51 debian64 pppd[967]: CHAP authentication succeeded: 
> Authentication success,Welcome!
> Aug 14 08:13:51 debian64 pppd[967]: CHAP authentication succeeded
> Aug 14 08:13:51 debian64 pppd[967]: peer from calling number 
> 00:E0:FC:37:3C:02 authorized
> Aug 14 08:13:51 debian64 pppd[967]: local  IP address <IP1>
> Aug 14 08:13:51 debian64 pppd[967]: remote IP address <IP2>
> Aug 14 08:13:51 debian64 pppd[967]: primary   DNS address <IP3>
> Aug 14 08:13:51 debian64 pppd[967]: secondary DNS address <IP4>
> Aug 14 08:13:51 debian64 kernel: ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:46:10 +0800
> From: Bret Busby <bret.bu...@gmail.com>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Problem with Debian 6 LTS and vlc
> Message-ID: 
> <cacx6j8npjovaegndz0o3mfw_4k4evx7a1wkamnjjmbh-ahw...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Hello.
> 
> I am not sure whether support queries specific to Debian 6 LTS, should
> be posted to this list, or to the LTS list - on the web page at
> https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Contact#debian-lts
> is
> 
> "
> Mailing lists
> 
> debian-lts
> 
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/ (gmane)
> 
> Description: Discussion and coordination of long-term support work for
> Debian. Everyone involved or interested in providing Long-Term Support
> for Debian should feel free to join this list. Discussion of policy,
> on-going support issues, and anything else relating to LTS are all
> on-topic here.
> "
> 
> which makes that list appear to me (along with the messages that I
> have so far seen posted to it), to be for developers, rather than for
> Debian 6 LTS users who are seeking support.
> 
> I have just tried to install vlc on this laptop.
> 
> At first attempt, it kept prompting for the "disc number...", so I
> checked the /etc/apt/sources.list file, and found that it was not set
> up for LTS.
> 
> So, I updated the /etc/apt/sources.list file, as (I believe) shown on
> the relevant wiki web page, and ran apt-get update and then apt-get
> upgrade, and that apparently included removal of about 3.6MB of
> something (it did not say what would be removed).
> 
> But, now I can not install vlc.
> 
> I get, in the error box (the error classification/description, can not
> be copied and pasted),
> 
> "
> vlc:
> Depends: vlc-nox but it is not going to be installed
> Depends: libfribidi0 (>=0.19.2) but it is not installable
> Depends: libsdl-image1.2 (>=1.2.10) but it is not installable
> Depends: libxcb-keysyms1 (>=0.3.6) but it is not installable
> Recommends: vlc-plugin-notify but it is not going to be installed
> Recommends: vlc-plugin-pulse but it is not going to be installed
> "
> 
> Is vlc no longer installable, on Debian 6?
> 
> -- 
> Bret Busby
> Armadale
> West Australia
> ..............
> 
> "So once you do know what the question actually is,
> you'll know what the answer means."
> - Deep Thought,
> Chapter 28 of Book 1 of
> "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
> A Trilogy In Four Parts",
> written by Douglas Adams,
> published by Pan Books, 1992
> 
> ....................................................
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 04:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Joerg Desch <n...@jdesch.de>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: How to mount a LUKS partition from within GNOME?
> Message-ID: <lshf5j$djd$2...@ger.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> 
> Does nobody have a solution for this?
> 
> Am Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:21:51 +0000 schrieb Joerg Desch:
> 
>> My configuration entries are:
>> 
>> # /etc/crypttab private_luks  /dev/sdb7  none  luks,noauto
>> 
>> # /etc/fstab /dev/mapper/private_luks /media/privates ext4
>> user,nofail,noauto,noatime\
>> 1 2
> 
> GNOME (Nautilus) shows me the unmounted LUKS partition. But is labeled 
> with the size of the partition. "Clicking" on the entry mounts the 
> partition, but I always have to enter the admin password too.
> 
> After this, the partition is mounted, but the entries in fstab/crypttab 
> are totally ignored!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1482560c-11fb-4a4e-9033-bf6d96e1b...@yahoo.com

Reply via email to