On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 10:26 AM, The Wanderer <wande...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> On 08/10/2014 10:15 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, The Wanderer <wande...@fastmail.fm>
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/10/2014 09:26 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>>>
>>>> halt/poweroff/reboot have called shutdown at least since
>>>> 6/squeeze.
>>>
>>> Ah, so that may be a Debian-specific behavior, rather than an
>>> upstream one?
>>>
>>> That might explain the discrepancy, if so.
>>>
>>> If not, perhaps the environment in question is simply using older
>>> versions of those tools, which do not yet invoke 'shutdown'...
>>
>> It's in the BSDs that halt&co don't call shutdown. It's been called
>> in sysvinit for a long time.
>
> It's entirely possible that that environment in question does not use
> sysvinit even in part, so it's not entirely impossible that it's
> actually using halt etc. from a non-sysvinit source. I'll have to
> investigate if I decide it's worth the bother to find out.
>
> Thanks for the information; this is a potentially interesting puzzle
> where I didn't even realize one might exist.

You're welcome.

FTR, even sysvinit 2.57 in pre-buzz had the note about this being a
version where using halt&co is OK.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=swhc9c5q35dmp8uzpu2iw774xl6xmtdjkf2jzkuc+9...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to