Cognitive dissonance? On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:24 AM, PaulNM <deb...@paulscrap.com> wrote: > Hi, please reply to the list as I am subscribed. > > On 08/07/2014 05:56 PM, Johann Spies wrote: >> For the sake of clarity: The failure to boot was on the dist-upgraded >> system and was due to systemd.sysfs. I will not repeat what I said in my >> previous thread about this (see 'Systemd waisted 5 hours of my time'). >> >> My installation of stable was exactly to escape the nightmares of >> systemd.sysfs which caused every computer on which it was installed so >> far not to be able to boot - not even in single user mode. >> >> As stable did not work out in this case, I tried with the clean >> installation to upgrade to testing to see whether I could use systemd >> without the previous problems, but the problems repeated itself. >> >> And I never said systemd was a problem on Wheezy. Read my email more >> thoroughly please. > > I did read your email thoroughly. While it's true you didn't explicitly > state you believed systemd caused issues on the stable install, it was > strongly implied by the subject line and your final statement of "I > would like to return to Debian when the systemd problems are sorted > out.". At least two other people were under that impression as well. > > Also, I didn't want to assume you knew much about systemd. There's a > bunch of misunderstanding about it going around at the moment, and there > have been a few emails lately where systemd was blamed for issues it has > nothing to do with. For all I knew, you could very well have been > someone new to Linux/Debian and misunderstood what was happening. We're > just trying to help.
? -- Joel Rees Be careful where you see conspiracy. Look first in your own heart. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caar43imdfvgn1bjtf0kxwv+g2euj-p7xxt0abqbj9vq-wro...@mail.gmail.com
