Zenaan Harkness writes:
> So thank you Joel for spending the time to describe these
> concepts as 'pedantically' as you have. Your descriptions
> are an excellent grounding for the conversation which is
> undoubtedly going to continue :)
One question. Can you give me an example of Turing completeness with
just declarations?
If not, the description you refer to may be valid only when discussing
"configuration", and even there there is some loss.
[Scripts, in the Unix world - and GNU is a Unix replacement - are
something almost Turing complete or Turing complete, depending on the
language used for the a given script]
--
/\ ___ Ubuntu: ancient
/___/\_|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_____ African word
//--\| | \| | Integralista GNUslamico meaning "I can
\/ coltivatore diretto di software not install
già sistemista a tempo (altrui) perso... Debian"
Warning: gnome-config-daemon considered more dangerous than GOTO
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21455.43692.243729.192...@mail.eng.it
