Le 21/07/2014 17:59, Liam O'Toole a écrit : > On 2014-07-21, Erwan David <er...@rail.eu.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:26:44PM CEST, Liam O'Toole >> <liam.p.oto...@gmail.com> said: >>> On 2014-07-21, Erwan David <er...@rail.eu.org> wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:36:30PM CEST, Jonathan Dowland >>>> <j...@debian.org> said: >>> (...) >>> >>>>> This and more excellent documentation at >>>>> https://wiki.debian.org/systemd#Configuring_for_testing >>>> I do not have the ressources to test : no time no machine which I can >>>> afford to break. >>> In that case, Debian Sid is not a wise choice of operating system. >> The mess is now in testing, not anymore limited to sid. And testing >> should be rather stable the last step before stable distrib. So, small >> problems yes, but major one should have disapeared, and tools & docs >> to repair what rest should be easily reachable. ANd note that the init >> system is not just any package. Any bug on it is potentially grave, >> since it may break every other packages. >> > I assumed you were using sid based on the subject of this thread. > However, I refer you to /usr/share/doc/base-files/README: "You should > consider the testing and unstable distributions as two sides of the same > coin". Testing is sometimes broken too, and in fact the breakage can > take *longer* to fix than in the case of sid. If you are unwilling or > unable to test, you should avoid both. >
There is a difference between a package/service broken (I had some and I handled them by downgrading to previous version till it was sorted, eg on openldap), and having a non booting system (and seeing the number of *open* bugs on systemd the risk is far from negligeable). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53cd3dd9.6000...@rail.eu.org
