On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:44:20AM -0400, Tom H wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Miles Fidelman > <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> wrote: > > Tom H wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > >>> On Fri 11 Jul 2014 at 12:21:57 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > > >>>> A bizarre thought just popped into my head, in the form of a little > >>>> voice. The little voice told me that if they guys who controlled the > >>>> decision to go to systemd had been the decision makers in 1990, Linux > >>>> would have a microkernel today. > >>> > >>> This thread has been quite interesting. In it a number concerns about > >>> system have been comprehensively answered. > >>> > >>> * Double-forking is not a problem. > >>> * Logs are in text format. > >>> * libsystemd-daemon0 doesn't affect users of other init systems. > >>> > >>> All useful stuff and (given the lack of substantial counter-argument) > >>> cause for regarding these questions as settled. > >> > >> The s/n ratio would be higher in threads such as these if people read > >> the documentation... > >> > > Now that is a rather gratuitous and disingenuous statement. > > It's neither gratuitous nor disingenious. There's a pattern of someone > finding that something doesn't work the way that someone expects and > rather than going through the documentation or google first, there's a > post here with a more or less gleeful "I've found something broken in > systemd."
The posts I've made were made because the issues I struck after installing systemd-sysv could happen to others in the future and whether it is a "teething bug" or an issue with systemd configuration at least there is a mention of it in the archives. Also, it is probably a good idea to get any concerns "out in the open" *before* Jessie becomes stable. There may be an issue that has been overlooked. e.g. for me the keyboard repeat rate slowed right down, and when I ggogled it I found that others have found that their's sped up. I have to use the kbdrate command to fix it. There are some differences between the way Debian has adopted systemd and the way upstream documents it, so it I think if there are any concerns about this then it is a good idea to raise the issue here. -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140713151418.GB19299@tal