* On 2014 15 Jun 14:25 -0500, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 14:58 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > http://www.troubleshooters.com/lpm/201406/201406.htm > > At the moment we IMO should stay away from Razor-Qt for daily usage, but > it can't harm to install it and to monitor it's progress. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razor-qt
Which has now been superceded by LXQt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LXQt#Qt_port There is an WNPP bug on this package but it has yet to be uploaded/migrated to Sid. Even though I am pleased with Xfce, I think its developers will have to make a decision, pursue the taillights of GTK3 (driven by GNOME) or stick with GTK2 used by Mate. > IMO much of the evil we Linux KISS principle nerds experience is related > to the GTK/GNOME policy. I see LXQt as a means to break away from that without having to go to the insanely bloated KDE4. It's hard to say if LXQt will be able to break free of systemd subsuming every other low-level system in sight. For the record I am using systemd without any issues, but then I am doing so on desktop systems. I just dislike the increasingly monolithic architecture of systemd. No, I don't bring this up to start another flame war as I am no fan of sysvinit and a pile of shell scripts either. - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140615203343.ga28...@n0nb.us
