On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 03:14:27 +1200 Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:56:53PM +0400, Reco wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 01:31:26PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > Quote from the first link: > > > > > > The udev built from the systemd source tree will stay compatible > > > with non-systemd init systems for a long time. This change is mostly > > > a detail of the build scheme, rather than a change of direction or > > > interfaces. Accordingly, the libudev API is untouched by these build > > > infrastructure changes. For us, compatibility is key. > > > > > > > Allow me to remind you this story: > > Which doesn't change the facts. Which facts are you talking about? That systemd and udev use the same merged codebase? Or the fact that udev is deliberately changing to comply with systemd design? Also note that the intention above talks about API, they don't say anything about semantics of said API (example - so called 'predictable NIC names'). Reco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140609213521.f3a8c096b975cab653a88...@gmail.com
