Ahoj, Dňa Sat, 7 Jun 2014 23:10:02 +0100 Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> napísal:
> I prefer aptitude because I know what I am doing with it (sort of) > and because I don't have such a plethora of commands: apt-get, > apt-cache, apt-file etc. to remember. But I use apt-x on occasion > since it is no longer recommended that you should stick rigidly with > only one of them. I strongly dislike Synaptic for almost every job. > Each to his own. :-) That's one of the things I love about Debian > and Linux. Sure, here is today example (it comes from my Raspbian with recompiled packages from sid in my own repo): LANG=C apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages have been kept back: uwsgi uwsgi-core 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. And now, why they are not upgraded?! Then i run aptitude and after some keypress is see, that there is one conflict with some co-package (cgi plugin) from old uwsgi version. regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature