On 5/19/14, Richard Hector <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/05/14 16:20, Carl Fink wrote: >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:50:44PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>> On 5/19/14, Lee Winter <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> But, contrary to Stallman's arguments, intellectual property is real >>>> and >>>> worth protecting. >>> >>> RMS never said intellectual creations are not real. >>> >>> RMS never said intellectual creations are not worth protecting. >>> >>> PLEASE cite, when you are unsure. You were doing quite well up to this >>> point. >> >> RMs said to me, personally, that "intellectual property" does not exist >> except legally and should not exist legally. Cite: personal >> communication. > > LOL. You're trying to have an argument, but missing. "intellectual > creations" and "intellectual property" are different phrases. Of course > both phrases probably have different meanings when used by different > people, as well.
Ohhh, and I was having _so_ much fun.. Now if only 'intellectual property' actually had meaning in law... perhaps we could have a _real_ argument. Too hopeful? Oh well, Zenaan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAOsGNSShuV60a+z8nWD_ZmBr83jn=phMaOd=MYmZS3_xQOFT=g...@mail.gmail.com
