On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 at 18:26 GMT, David Gaudine penned: > On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 10:35 AM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > > There's an idea. I'll try it. Although personally I'd still rather > receive the message in my debian-user folder and a CC in my inbox. I > suppose I can use a rule to duplicate the message if it's to > debian-user with me as a reference. I'm not too handy with procmail > but I can probably get by. Anything starting with ":0: c" (work on a > copy) doesn't seem to work on my server.
Shouldn't that be :0 c: ? > I'm surprised that so many people don't like CCs. When I send a > message, I want to know if somebody replies. Without a CC (or the > above) I won't get the reply until the next time I check the list, and > then only if read every message on the list or remember which subject > lines I've been following lately. One person mentioned that he > doesn't like to reply to the CC and then find out that the message was > also on the list; I agree, but I usually remember to look at the > headers to see if it's a CC. It's clearly a matter of preference. I just wish all mailers were smart enough to allow you to specify that preference reliably using headers. > Note: I replied to Kjetil's message by "reply all", deleting the > contents of the "to" and "cc" fields, and typing the list address. > Which sort of answers Monique's original question. And explains why so many people don't "fix" the defaults ... that sounds like a pain! -- monique PLEASE don't CC me. Please. Pretty please with sugar on top. Whatever it takes, just don't CC me! I'm already subscribed!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
