On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 12:06:21PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Sb, 03 mai 14, 18:25:59, Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 07:48:45AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > > > It was an issue for the OP. It's disputable if somebody who can't solve > > > such an issue on her/his own, should use testing, instead of stable. > > > > The issue is not whether one can solve it, but whether one should have > > to. I don't even use GNOME, so shouldn't even see the > > message. It gave the impression that your system would be horribly > > broken if you didn't run the command, and yet the command doesn't even > > exist on your system! > > > > This goes against the grain of having a system that just works. On one > > hand you have the DIY NetBSD style where this style of information is > > acceptable, while on the other hand you have a system with systemd, > > pulseaudio, GNOME, where the user can be a newbie and not have to worry > > about all that. > > > > It's like two 'opposing camps' trying to live under the one roof. > > I don't think this is entirely fair, this is about testing after all, > not stable.
Yeah, OK, I retract the last two paragraphs. -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140503192312.GA2025@tal
