Le 23.04.2014 15:33, Ralf Mardorf a écrit :
The idea of make a configuration file a binary file is the most
serious
bug of dconf. It's bad by design and when ever possible, we should
avoid
using software that needs dconf. As user use an editor that is
dependent
to dconf, to edit a file with root privileges and than try to use a
MUA
that's dependent to dconf, by the same user. You likely will
experience
another bug by design, a privileges issue. In the future expect more
insanity caused by the GNOME/GTK think tank.
You know, I think exactly the same ( I'm quite fond of minimal systems,
because, they are lighter, contains less bugs because less code, and
when a problem occur, it is easier to solve... oh, and it's faster to
download them, too :p ), plus some other stuff about things which
depends on dbus ( using XML everywhere is... hum... no, I will refrain
myself here ).
I just avoided speaking about those, because James might not be used to
the mailing-list's discussions about bloat-wares, gnome, systemd, etc...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/e22b42dcdbc275e1bcc9593a24966...@neutralite.org
