Hi Rafael,

>> How is it possible that one system will not see the update until last 
>> night when I have been running the update cycle each night and all my 
>> systems use the same uplink?
>
> >From the log:
>
>> Preparing to replace libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6 (using
>> .../libssl1.0.0_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_amd64.deb)
>
> You were upgrading to the version that I just released last night - perhaps 
> the other machines ran apt-get update before it was released so they didn't 
> see it.

Aha, I assumed this was the same ssl upgrade I had seen on my other systems 
last week. I now see this is the upgrade from deb7u6 to deb7u7.

>> ---------------------
>> Why did the apt-get update NOT restart the services? How can I find out?
>
> Services are never automatically restarted due to library updates, you need 
> to do that by hand. Some times, restarting services might be proposed.

Ok, I assumes the restarts were allways done as last week several ssl upgrades 
did service restarts for me.

> The message in the log is just libssl1.0.0 checking for services that might 
> need to be restarted to get the Heartbleed bugfix applied. Had it found any, 
> it would have proposed you to restart them.
But that is funy because the checkrestart command that I issued right after 
found several services that needed restarting. But maybe they did not need a 
restart just for hartbleed?

Bonno Bloksma


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/89d1798a7351d040b4e74e0a043c69d786190...@hglexch-01.tio.nl

Reply via email to