On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:05:09PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > First of all, you've broken the thread. The thread was broken once > already by the March / April forced break at the end of the month. > You can't help that. But this time, you've broken it yourself by > starting a new thread.
Thread wasn't broken here. The References: header in Robert's mail
indicates that it was indeed a reply (to his original post on this
thread).
I see that you have an In-Reply-To: header, but no References: header. I
also see that you are using Zimbra, perhaps Zimbra needs to be taught
about References: headers.
Cheers,
Tom
--
The Second Law of Thermodynamics:
If you think things are in a mess now, just wait!
-- Jim Warner
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
