On 03/29/2014 01:32 PM, Peter Michaux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Mark Neyhart <mark.neyh...@akleg.gov> wrote: >> On 03/28/2014 03:22 PM, Peter Michaux wrote: >>> >>> Is Dirvish still a good choice in 2014? >>> >> >> Dirvish just works. I've been using it for years. > > Where is your bank directory? > > The example configuration file has /backups but that is not ok > according to the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard. > > | Applications must never create or require special files or > | subdirectories in the root directory. > I set it up before I read the FHS, so I used /backups. If I were to do it now, I'd probably use /srv/backups.
> Would /var/backups/dirvish be a good choice? The only thing the FHS > has to say about /var/backups is > > | Several directories are 'reserved' in the sense that they > | must not be used arbitrarily by some new application, > | since they would conflict with historical and/or local practice. It's just a personal preference, but I try not to use /var for anything which has the potential to get really big. I don't think you would have a problem with /var/backups/dirvish as long as it was a mount point for your actual backup volume. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5339b37f.7060...@akleg.gov
