On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Patrick Bartek <bartek...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> Did a couple of trial installs of Wheezy in VirtualBox in anticipation of
> the real thing on an as yet to be purchased notebook, and noticed something
> puzzling with the Guided-Encrypted-LVM partitioning option. (I've never
> done encryption on my systems before.)  The installer used a "classic"
> Extended partition, i.e. sda5, instead of a Primary one on which to place
> the LVMs: /, swap, /home.  /boot was a Primary, as expected.  Seems like a
> unneeded use of a logical partition layer on which to place another layer
> of logical partitions.
>
> Any valid reason for doing this?
>

Not that i have found. What you propose is exactly how I do mine. I have a
roughly 512MB /boot on sda1 and the rest of the drive on sda2, which
contains my encrypted partition, within which I put my LVM.


>
> I'd prefer just two Primary partitions: /boot, and the balance of the
> drive for the encrypted LVM partitions. Any reasons for not doing it that
> way?
>

It has worked great for many years for me. I've been running this config or
one similar to it (I used to put a separate swap partition, but the last
nuke and pave, I figured putting the swap partition within the LVM works
better and you only have to encrypt one filesystem. I've been running
luks-encrypted partitions since, oh, 2005 or 2006, I think. It's been a
while.

I don't know about your use cases, but here is something that you might be
interested in:

http://blog.neutrino.es/2011/unlocking-a-luks-encrypted-root-partition-remotely-via-ssh/

This can be fairly easily set up, but protect the script (encrypted thumb
drive works), as your encryption passphrase is contained within the script,
but if you are dealing with a remote server, you may wish to consider it.

HTH,
--b


>
> Thanks.
>
>
> B
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> https://lists.debian.org/20140329164941.077e3...@debian7.boseck208.net
>
>

Reply via email to