On Mi, 26 mar 14, 21:52:30, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:46:42AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2014/01/msg00063.html > > > > Thanks for this - I was unaware of it. I stand by what I said, though I > do understand the issue of lack of support for newest hardware. > > Maybe we need the option of a "release and a half" periodically but in > this instance, I think we'd need to make it clear that this might not be > quite as supportable.
My feeling is that since backports is official there is not much interest in -and-a-half releases. There's probably not much added value compared to stable + selected backports. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
