Scott Ferguson writes:
> > Are you sure I did that statement?
>
> No, I wasn't digitally signed. But it did have your distinctive
> X-echelon-food: header. :)
O.K. it is mine. Gotta understand which of the several personalities
did that statement and why. BTW, the other ones feels a bit
unauthoritative on this subject...
> > I got your quoting as some form of endorsment of the document at the
> > first link. Re-reading your message there is nothing confirming and
> > nothing denying.
>
> It (my referencing it) was unclear :/
A common problem, it seems :)
> > I would like to see how much power is required to
> > run it.
>
> Runs fine across Australian 3G "broadband" (two tin cans a bit of string
> and the attorney general playing man-in-the-middle) with an old Thinkpad
> T22 (256MB RAM) as the client.
Half of my coworkers reacted to my laughter thinking I was going
completly mad. (The other half knows it already happened a long
before).
--
/\ ___ Ubuntu: ancient
/___/\_|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_____ African word
//--\| | \| | Integralista GNUslamico meaning "I can
\/ coltivatore diretto di software not install
già sistemista a tempo (altrui) perso... Debian"
Warning: gnome-config-daemon considered more dangerous than GOTO
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/21252.30417.28962.194...@mail.eng.it
