On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:27 PM, John L. Ries <jr...@salford-systems.com>wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Rob Owens wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:04 PM, John L. Ries <jr...@salford-systems.com> >> wrote: >> I actually had a similar job when my wife asked me to set up >> public WiFi >> for her yarn shop (her office and mine are also on site). What >> I ended up doing was to use two routers; the "outer" (public) >> router being connected directly to the Internet, and the inner >> (private) one connected to the outer one using NAS. It works >> fine, except that my VOIP box has to be outside of both routers. >> >> Using two routers is a reasonable approach, but it would cause me too much >> duplication of equipment since I need to cover a large area. I would then >> need range extenders for each router. >> >> Does the office network need to cover a large area? Depending on your > church's needs, it might not even need Wifi at all. > Yes, unfortunately it does need to cover a large area. In fact, it needs to cover two buildings. The "public" wifi needs to cover a single large building.
