On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:51 AM, cletusjenkins <cletusjenk...@zoho.com> wrote: > > ---- On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:53:20 -0800 Ralf > Mardorf<ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote ---- > > > I agree, but they will kill you and now me too, because you mentioned > > that. Sexuality is a taboo! It's evil, it doesn't exist in the clean > > computer world! > > Any computer sufficiently complex to be considered sentient will have its own > particular perversions, different due to the differing physical hardware, but > still. Even the simplistic insect/bacteria computers we have now are far from > clean: > > (Not safe for work:) [obviously inappropriate link elided] > > (hoipefully such links do not violate some rule, if so I apologize, but I > couldn't help myself)
There are two problems with such links. One is that "iseekgirls.[domain]" is going to have a high probability of harbouring drive-bys and other kinds of malware that we don't really want to subject our current version of flash+browser to. As food for thought, it seems to me that the other problem, while I assume it's the one you reference in your comment about rules, involves principles of human condition which parallel the computer security problem. If you don't see what I mean, consider, who pays for the server space and internet bandwidth, why, and with what money? -- Joel Rees Be careful where you see conspiracy. Look first in your own heart. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caar43in2hntz30lobj+7dofxy5cz_nsdvlosuhxudc-47pb...@mail.gmail.com
