Hi. On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:11:26 -0700 Paul E Condon <pecon...@mesanetworks.net> wrote:
> > Ok, now it is starting to get interesting. gnome-keyring by itself is a > > process which should store user credentials. gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so is > > a library that (judging by name) is called by PolicyKit and is linked > > to a gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so. > > > > About the only reason that justifies storing user credentials if one > > prints with CUPS is that unlikely case that one configures CUPS instead > > of it. So, the message is harmless, and can be ignored. > > > > Still, something is calling gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so, and that leaves us > > libgnome-keyring0. > > > > Can you post the output of 'aptitude why libgnome-keyring0' please? > > > > Reco > > root@big:~# aptitude why libgnome-keyring0 > i gnome-disk-utility Depends libgnome-keyring0 (>= 2.22) > > I think I use disk-utility when formatting new disks to extN from > Windows whatever. Does this indicate that I must choose between > removing garbage warning messages and having a GUI disk utility > pre-installed for occasional use? > I hope not. Well, in be it another utility, I'd suggest you to rebuild it without libgnome-keyring dependency. But - since this is GNOME-disk-utility, I doubt such rebuild will be possible. I never understood the need of GUI for formatting (mkfs is all I ever need for this), so I cannot suggest you the replacement, sadly. As an experiment, please remove libgnome-keyring0 (should take out gnome-disk-utility as well), try to print something. To revert the change, invoke 'apt-get install gnome-disk-utility'. Reco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131231221413.d5a598336bab7f9df8a1e...@gmail.com
