On Wed 18 Dec 2013 at 14:13:10 +0000, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > > > > The goal to have native systemd support in every package with sysv > > scripts (if accepted) and a decision on a new init system may be > > related, but only the first is linked to the time of the freeze. My > > 'couple of years' might have been spurious but, considering the stated > > goal might only be realised a day before the freeze (or not at all), > > the merit of putting a focus on a decision date as pre-freeze isn't > > clear. > > There's no relationship between Debian choosing a default init system > and having native systemd support in every package that has a sysvinit > script.
Ok. > So, as I said up-thread, should the choice be systemd or upstart, the > earlier that a decision is taken, the better in order to iron out any > problems. A sound, common-sense strategy. > > Even if the decision was made in February/March/April would this imply > > going into Jessie with a new init system is a realistic possibility? > > Why not? I believe I got my question in first. Insights are welcome. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131218205418.gs5...@copernicus.demon.co.uk
