On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 07:43:32PM -0500, Jacob S. wrote: > On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:14:50 -0700 > Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 05:09:53PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > Why would anybody want to use UPnP? Wonderfully insecure... > > > > I was hoping the open source community might have done it right. > > I didn't want to have to mess with Linksys shitty HTML management :-) > > But are you sure you need UPnP to allow your games to go through the > Linksys FW? > > If you don't, disable the UPnP and it won't cause you any more problems. > http://grc.com/unpnp/unpnp.htm :-) >
Oh, don't get me wrong -- I don't need it for games and I disable it, and a lot that you probably don't. (Netmeeting uses it). I usually just plug right into the internet if I want to use it, but sometimes in a work environment it's best not to rock the boat. I bet I'm the only one on this list who's ever had read-only access to the Whistler tree. (I bet some vendors see quite a bit, and you really can learn it all with Inside Windows 2000 and the kernel debugger.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]