Le 19.11.2013 21:26, Nemeth Gyorgy a écrit :
2013-11-19 14:40 keltezéssel, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org írta:
Do not take me wrong, I do not say that Debian is not as good or
better
that Ubuntu (I think it is better, especially in terms of
flexibility:
there are more than one DE maintained in the distribution, instead
of
having a distro fork for each DE... this approach is just ugly for
me,
but is interesting for simple users not used to have choice. Choice
costs time, and some people do not want it for that reason.). It's
simply that your argumentation lacks strength, and should never
convince
any user which knows Debian and Ubuntu.
Actually it is not a distro fork. The pool of Ubuntu, Kubuntu,
Xubuntu,
<whatever>ubuntu is the same (the sources.list is the same for all).
You
can consider the different 'distributions' as different install sets
for
the same distribution with different default environments and
settings.
There are metapackages for all the 'distributions' so choosing one or
another is just an apt-get install and selecting the newly installed
desktop as default.
--
--- Friczy ---
'Death is not a bug, it's a feature'
So, why people feels the need to give them different names? And, if I
understand things at least a little, examples like KUbuntu are no longer
supported by Canonical, so they are unofficial, so they can not be
called the same distro.
Take any other distribution:
_ Debian
_ ArchLinux
_ Mint
_ Fedora
None of them have different names for different DEs, AFAIK.
PS: please do not CC me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b269511f7b6628adb04a59dbb5baf...@neutralite.org
