On 30/10/2013 4:40 AM, ken wrote: > On 10/29/2013 12:26 PM Andrew McGlashan wrote: >>> >all the source code, develop things yourself, etc. >> Latest news, almost 2 years ago!!! > > I have to laugh at this kind of thinking. Some device can work > flawlessly, do exactly what you want. do it exactly how you want it > done, and cost less than the newest. But if the device was developed > TWO YEARS AGO (!!), then it's no good?! > > Well, I suppose the calendar year is a metric which is easy to > understand and doesn't require very much thought to make an assessment. > Too, it says more about the assessor than the assessed.
Umm, one line you have a problem with? From all the context? That's just too funny in itself. I would love for OpenMoko to be up to date with current hardware standards. Heck, even without the latest hardware standards, I would still be expecting more /news/ about the project. If it was a Debian package, it would have been orphaned or up for adoption wouldn't it? No news in two years says a great deal in itself in the mobile hardware world... Cheers AndrewM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5270e074.3070...@affinityvision.com.au