On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 14:05 +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote: > http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb > 403 Forbidden'
Try http://debian.netcologne.de/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb instead [1]. Regards, Ralf PS: [2] [1] $ wget http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb --2013-10-12 16:34:59-- http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb Resolving http.debian.net (http.debian.net)... 46.4.205.44, 2a01:4f8:131:152c::42 Connecting to http.debian.net (http.debian.net)|46.4.205.44|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently Location: http://debian.netcologne.de/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb [following] --2013-10-12 16:34:59-- http://debian.netcologne.de/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb Resolving debian.netcologne.de (debian.netcologne.de)... 194.8.197.22, 2001:4dd0:1234:1::deb Connecting to debian.netcologne.de (debian.netcologne.de)| 194.8.197.22|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 523694 (511K) [application/x-debian-package] Saving to: ‘gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb’ 100%[=======================================================================>] 523,694 593KB/s in 0.9s 2013-10-12 16:35:00 (593 KB/s) - ‘gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb’ saved [523694/523694] [2] On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 08:51 -0400, Tom H wrote: > You're installing from an unofficial repository and complaining about > conflicts. Good one! [snip] > You really have no clue how distributions are run, do you? [snip] You misunderstand, this is my argumentation. Maintaining Mate packages for official repositories is a hard job, regarding to issues caused by upstream. Because I know how some distributions work, there is my argumentation about issues with upstream that can't be solved by a council. On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 14:47 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 12.10.2013 14:04, Mark Allums a écrit : > > The point of mentioning MATE was in context with adding MATE to > > Debian. Our point was, there are only minor problems with that > > happening, and they should be solvable fairly easily within a short > > period of time > > > (i.e., in the time between releases of Stable). > > If it was so easy, then I can only guess that MATE's users > finally do not care that much to have it into official repo, and > should accept that other people uses that as an argument that it > *might* give problems. Because, yes, 3rd party repo are possible, but > are not supported by Debian or any other major distro, +1. On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 08:42 -0500, Mark Allums wrote: > I can't develop for MATE, it's not part of my skill set. I will > encourage other people to get involved, that much, I can do. You can learn and become a package maintainer, you don't need to become a Mate developer. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1381589303.744.267.camel@archlinux
