On 2013-10-07, Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote: >> >> Maybe he thought that given the apt script is run before the logrotate >> script in cron.daily (if indeed they're handled in alphabetical order? >> (apparently, yes, they're run in 'lexical sort order' order according to >> the run-parts man page)), if the apt script hung for any reason, the >> logrotate script would never get past the bottleneck, thus "explaining" **************** should have 'run-parts'
Anyhow, it's a vain _hypothesis_ a proposal intended to explain certain facts or observations >> his problem. > > Remember what Benny Hill said: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6jaKkE0RsI but not an assumption a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn; a hypothesis that is taken for granted -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnl55951.2gs.cu...@einstein.electron.org