Bob Proulx a écrit : > > auto eth0 > allow-hotplug eth0 > iface eth0 inet static > address 192.168.1.42 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > gateway 192.168.1.1 > up ip addr add 192.168.1.43/24 dev eth0 label eth0:0 > down ip addr del 192.168.1.43/24 dev eth0 label eth0:0 > up ip addr add 192.168.1.44/24 dev eth0 label eth0:1 > down ip addr del 192.168.1.44/24 dev eth0 label eth0:1
You don't even need to define a label, unless you want to display the additional addresses with ifconfig (not needed with ip addr ls). > Personally I find that way simpler and looks nicer. Then there is > never a problem with interfaces and virtual interfaces getting out of > sync with each other. There is only ever one real interface and the > rest are simply slaved off of it. But others don't like it and like > the implementation of many virtual interfaces. IP aliases/labels are not virtual interfaces. And all the trouble comes from treating them as interfaces, which they are not. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/521887f9.2020...@plouf.fr.eu.org
