> On 07/26/2013 11:26 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 26 Jul 2013 at 12:55:04 +0300, Lars Noodén wrote:
> > 
> >> It's a good idea for keys to be rotated periodically anyway.
> > 
> > Does this 'good idea' have reasons to support it?

"The time to expiration must therefore be much shorter than the expected
time for cryptanalysis." - http://www.ecfirst.com/pkifaq.html#18

IOW for the last 30 years and today you should change the key
periodically every < 20 years, lets say every 15 years, until a person
with savant syndrome is able to do prime factorization, then you don't
need to use a key anymore? <- question mark



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1374916776.715.11.camel@archlinux

Reply via email to