If you care to open any decent book on computer security, you will note that the first paragraph or so will state clearly that 100% security is impossible, dreamish.
Cryptography + free software + steganography are to be used all together, to greatly increase the boundaries. But if you think you will find a 100% safe answer, you better join NSA. -- Luther Blisset GNUPG/PGP KEY: 6722CF80 I challenge you to play the game in which there is no loser but everything is fun and worthwhile!
--- Begin Message ---On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 20:40 +0200, Slavko wrote: > Dňa 20.06.2013 17:12 Greg wrote / napísal(a): > > > I'm just wondering what debian does to check and protect its users, so > > fuck me, right? > > Your protection is your responsibility. The Debian (and other OS) can > only help you with this. Of course, some can do it better and another > no. An some can criminalize you, when you want to see what is inside (by > license violation), but these last are then taking responsibility, but > do you really want to loose your own responsibility? > > IMO, if you want to transmit your responsibility, you must select > another model of OS, than Debian is. > > regards > So I have no right to ask to to even think about how software is built or made available by debian? To protect myself I have but to debug every line of code I use and build it all myself, on CPU's I forged in my backyard smithy? Perhaps I could launch my own satellites to ensure safe global access to a self-made internet. Iran has gone down that path, perhaps we should all do likewise, or just go live in a cave or use openbsd machines with the network cards pulled out? What if they get to Theo? Then I'm done for! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1371849809.10674.53.ca...@fast.cercy.net
--- End Message ---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
