Though it may appear as if I was being ironic in my last comment, I don't think you've exceeded in your harshness. I'm not offended and it did indeed help me to question my reliance on this software.
So my "thank you" was sincere, though it kind of felt like a bitchslap.. :)
--- Begin Message ---On Wed 05 Jun 2013 at 13:21:22 -0300, André Nunes Batista wrote: > Well, fair enough, I'll give isohybrid a try. I it's certainly a shame > that I am stuck to something I first tried when the command line caused > me the creeps. > > Nonetheless, my advice was addressed to someone who might be felling > discouraged after trying to follow cryptic instructions on command line, > not to someone who would know how to log procedures, lookup, debug and > change config files and post all related info on the first email. > > Thank you for the bitchslap. On reflection I might have gone a bit over the top, so many apologies if anything I said came through as personal or insulting. It wasn't intended that way but as a response to the two posts which advocated UNetbootin for writing a Debian i386/amd64 ISO to a USB device. There may have been a time when a UNetbootin-like program was immensely useful for such a task but lot of recent effort has been put into polishing isohybrid production so it seems a waste not take advantage of it. Debian doesn't always produce the perfect outcome suiting everyone, but in this case I think it has unarguably developed something of quality for its users. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130605183105.GH26394@desktop
--- End Message ---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
