Good morning all, I am trying to add a partition to the unused space on a hard drive. Using parted, I keep getting "Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performance." There is not a whole lot of explanation out there that explains the calculations necessary to determine the sector numbers to use for starting and ending a partition to avoid this message, but what I have found indicates the starting number should be a multiple of eight. All of the multiples of eight that I have tried still give me the error. Using the error phrase as a search term shows a lot of other people asking the same questions, but again not a lot of explanation for the underlying cause.
This 1TB disk reports both physical and logical sector sizes of 512 bytes each, and is currently partitioned with one extended partition that is made up of the entire disk. It has three existing logical partitions, and parted tells me the first two are aligned, and the third is not. I would like to leave the existing partitions as they are, and create one more optimally aligned partition. The existing layout is as follows, and an example of what I did in trying to create a 100GB partition: $ sudo parted -a opt /dev/sdb GNU Parted 2.3 Using /dev/sdb Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. (parted) unit s (parted) p Model: ATA ST31000524AS (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 1953525168s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 2048s 1953523711s 1953521664s extended lba 5 4096s 683732991s 683728896s logical 6 683735040s 976762879s 293027840s logical 7 976762943s 1172081149s 195318207s logical (parted) mkpart Partition type? primary/logical? logical File system type? [ext2]? Start? 1172083200 End? 1953523703 Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performance. Ignore/Cancel? c (parted) q Can anyone tell me what values I should use for the starting and ending sectors for the next partition so that I do not get the error message? Would anyone be willing to share the mathematical calculation that helps determine those values (I am assuming there is one since parted is able to make assertions based on something)? Is it possible that the physical sector size is 4096 bytes, and if so how would I determine that, and how does that affect things? FWIW, at this point I don't care about the fact that partition 7 is not properly aligned, and I don't care if I have to leave some space unused. I just want to understand how to avoid the error while using as much of the available space as I can in an optimal manner. Any light is appreciated. Craig Sent - Gtek Web Mail -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367847550.77611...@webmail.gtek.biz
