On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 12:57:12 -0400 Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> klaus imgrund wrote: > >>>>Anyplace where there is a large group of young males who express a > > > >>>>desire to kill Americans AND is unchecked by their government is a > > > >>>>legitimate target. It's the "unchecked by their government" which > >is >>>the key. Yes, we are inconsistent about who we went after > >first -- that >>>is political reality. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>>You going to GPL those guys? > >>> > >> > >>NAZIS !!! > >> > >> > > > > Who? The FSF? > > No. I made an unsuccesful attempt at invoking Godwin's Law: > > ********* > http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/g/Godwin_s_Law.html > > Godwin's Law prov. [Usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows > longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler > approaches one." There is a tradition in many groups that, once this > occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has > automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law > thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread > length in those groups. However there is also a widely- recognized > codicil that any intentional triggering of Godwin's Law in order to > invoke its thread-ending effects will be unsuccessful. > ********* > > I thought since we hit the point of dicsussing terrorism, Nazis > weren't a stretch, and the discussion had lost any vestiges of > usefuleness(relating to the GPL). Of course, since my mention was > with the specific intent of activating Godwin's Law, it didn't work. > > -Roberto > One of the most central policies of the German Nazi party was the banishment of national boundaries, a centralised world government, and international free trade. I don't see any difference to what is happening now. Regards, David. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
