On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:47:50AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > Personally I like the about two-year stable release schedule. It is > > long enough > > I appreciate knowing that our setup will not break due to this but > also compile and download various packages like libreoffice and > xfce-4.10. > > Now I would not expect libreoffice to be packaged but xfce-4.10 had a
?? $ rmadison libreoffice libreoffice | 1:3.3.2-2~bpo60+1 | squeeze-backports | source libreoffice | 1:3.3.3-4~bpo60+1 | squeeze-backports | source, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64 libreoffice | 1:3.4.3-3~bpo60+1 | squeeze-backports | source libreoffice | 1:3.5.4-7~bpo60+1 | squeeze-backports | source, sparc libreoffice | 1:3.5.4+dfsg-3~bpo60+2 | squeeze-backports | source, amd64, armel, i386, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390 libreoffice | 1:3.5.4+dfsg-4 | wheezy | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc libreoffice | 1:3.5.4+dfsg-4 | sid | source, mips, sparc libreoffice | 1:3.5.4+dfsg2-1 | sid | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x libreoffice | 1:3.6.5-1 | experimental | source, s390, s390x libreoffice | 1:4.0.2~rc1-1 | experimental | source, powerpc libreoffice | 1:4.0.2~rc2-2 | experimental | source, amd64, armel, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 And yes, 4.0.x will also be in wheezy-backports when it's time for that. Using it from "unstable" is bad, because it'll also give you a loads of libs not in wheezy which might easily end up pullling a new libc6 etc. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
