[Sunday 19 October 2003 19:09] John Hasler: > > To start with, it should be graphical, so vim, emacs and the like > > are no option to me... > > What do you mean by graphical? Emacs has menus, icons, cut&paste > with the mouse, mouse control of the cursor, etc. What is it that > people mean by a "graphical" editor?
Well... Built with widgets? :-s Somehow, I expected this reply. It's more of a look-n-feel thing. I don't mind console apps, but for some purposes, I like the "graphical" approach better. It's not (only) about being able to control things using the mouse etc. I understand the point about Emacs being as "graphical" as anything else in a certain way, but I can't believe *you* don't understand what I meant with "graphical". :-) Greets, Tom -- "Was soll uns denn das ew'ge Schaffen! Geschaffenes zu nichts hinwegzuraffen!" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
